Sustainability Life Cycle
We have argued that to sustain all our futures we need to design for current and evolving needs over time. We could call this ‘spatial dexterity’ – the ability of a space to continually accommodate and negotiate between individual needs and collective preferences.
Spatial dexterity goes beyond cupboards with fold out ironing boards, LAN connections at kitchen counters or sliding walls. It means that the space should be designed generously, with sufficient thresholds and adaptability to empower residents to resolve the tension between changing spatial needs, for themselves. This is a cornerstone of a building’s ‘ability to sustain’, as neighbourhood demands vary (outside-in) and residents’ needs evolve through their own life cycle (inside-out).
Housing to support Lifetime Social Mobility
In the branding of housing as a commodity, we have been sold the concept of ‘starter’, ‘family’ and ‘retirement’ types, because these titles are convenient for quantifying individuals by what they can afford.
Maarit Heinonen-Smith posits alternative categories for housing, using occupant life-cycle behaviour to define a broad ‘agenda’ for any particular home. The focus shifts towards the occupier, their relationships and behaviours, which challenges the designer to find innovative ways to meet these needs.
She recognises phases of dependency, ranging from more independent lifestyles (‘discovery’ and ‘purpose’) to acknowledging caring needs or responsibilities (‘dependence’ and ‘commitment’). This seems radical because it separates age and economic status from need, while beginning to eliminate the assumed gender roles that ‘starter’ or ‘family’ housing implies.